DIDATTICA A DISTANZA E ITALIANO L2: DINAMICHE DELL’INTERAZIONE NELLA CLASSE ONLINE

Katia Raineri, Daniela Veronesi

Abstract


This paper presents a study of video-mediated classroom interaction, a modality of teaching and learning which in the past two years has experienced a rapid growth as a consequence of the Coronavirus emergency. By analysing a collection of audio- and videorecorded virtual secondary school classes devoted to Italian as L2 in South Tyrol, we examine the way in which teachers and students cope with the challenges of not being physically co-present, and discuss how fundamental mechanisms of face-to-face classroom interaction – participants’ mutual orientation, turn-taking, and instructors’ actions like questions and evaluations – are partially modified in the online setting, making it more complex, for instructors, to sustain students’ active participation. Final reflexions are devoted to potential didactic implications of the findings.


Parole chiave


DAD; italiano L2; interazione in classe; multimodalità; analisi della conversazione

Full Text

PDF

Riferimenti bibliografici


Andrén M., Chekaite A., 2017, “Don’t Laugh! Socialization of Laughter and Smiling in Pre-School and School Settings”, in Bateman, A., Church, A. (a cura di), Children’s Knowledge-in-Interaction, Singapore, Springer, pp. 127-148.

Arminen I., Licoppe C., Spagnolli A., 2016, “Respecifying Mediated Interaction”, in Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(4), pp. 290-309.

Autonome Provinz Bozen, 2021, Linee guida Quadro per le Scuole Primarie e Secondarie dell’Alto Adige, www.provinz.bz.it/bildung-sprache/didaktik-beratung/rahmenrichtlinien. asp.

Brown, D., 2014, “The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis”, in Language Teaching Research 20(4), pp. 436-458.

Cella R., Viale M., 2021, “Che cosa resterà della didattica a distanza?”, in Italiano a scuola (3), pp. I-VI.

Demo H., Veronesi D., 2019, “Universal Design for Learning nelle interazioni in calsse, tra pedagogia speciale e analisi della conversazione”, in D. Ianes, D. (a cura di), Didattica e Inclusione Scolastica, Milano, Franco Angeli, pp. 31-50.

Ellis R. 2017, “Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: Research, Theory, Applications, Implications”, in Nassaji, H. e Kartchava, E., Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning. Research, Theory, Applications, Implications, New York, Routledge, pp. 3-18.

Fele G., 2007, L’analisi della conversazione, Bologna, Il Mulino.

Fele G., Paoletti I., 2003, L’interazione in classe, Bologna, Il Mulino.

Gardner R., 2012, “Conversation Analysis in the Classroom”, in Sidnell, J. e Stivers, T. (a cura di), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 593-610.

Gardner R., 2019, “Classroom Interaction research. The State of the Art” in Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), pp. 212-226.

Grassi R., 2020, “La reazione all’errore. Implicazioni didattiche e interazionali dei principali tipi di feedback correttivo conversazionale in classe”, in Lend 1, pp. 40-51.

Grassi R. (a cura di), 2018, Il trattamento dell’errore nella classe di italiano L2: teorie e pratiche a confronto, Firenze, Cesati.

Lyster R., Ranta L., 1997, Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake. Negotiation of Forms in Communicative Classroom, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Ingwer P., 2007, “Intra- und interpersonelle Koordinierung am Unterrichtsanfang”, in Schmitt, R. (a cura di), Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion, Tübingen, Narr, pp. 195-224.

Jefferson G., 2004, “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction”, in Lerner G. (a cura di), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation), Amsterdam, Benjamins, pp. 13-23.

Kääntä L., 2012, “Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction”, in Classroom Discourse, 3(2), pp. 166-186.

Kendon A., 1990, Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behaviour in Focused Encounters, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lee Y., 2007, “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp. 1204-1230.

Licoppe C., Morel J., 2012, “Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls”, in Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), pp. 399-429.

Luff P., Heath C., Kuzuoka H., Hindmarsh J., Yamazaki K., Oyama, S., 2003, “Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration”, in Human Computer Interaction, 18, pp. 51-84.

Majlesi A. R., 2014, “Finger dialogue. The embodied accomplishment of learnables in instructing grammar on a worksheet”, in Journal of Pragmatics, 64, pp. 35-51.

Margutti P., 2006, «Are you human beings?» Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17, pp. 313-346.

Margutti P., 2007, “Formulare una domanda per ottenere «quella» risposta: aspetti linguistici, organizzazione dell’interazione e costruzione di conoscenze in classe”, in Baraldi, C. (a cura di), Dialogare in classe. La relazione tra insegnanti e studenti, Roma, Donzelli, pp. 29-48.

Margutti, P., 2010, “On designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom interaction”, in Research on Language and Social Interaction 43, pp. 315-345.

Margutti P., Drew P., 2014, “Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction”, in Language and Education, 28(5), pp. 436-458.

Mehan H., 1979, Learning Lesson. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.

Meredith J., 2019, “Conversation Analysis and Online Interaction”, in Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), pp. 241-256.

Monaco C., Pontecorvo, C., 2009, “La discussione in classe: cambiamenti a carico della struttura di partecipazione asimmetrica”, in Fatigante, M., Mariottini, L., Sciubbia, M.E. (a cura di), Lingua e società. Scritti in onore di Franca Orletti, Milano, FrancoAngeli, pp. 70-87.

Monami E., 2011, “Interazione orale docente-studente in classi di italiano L2: strategie di correzione dell’errore”, in RILA, 3, pp. 555-576.

Monami E., 2013, Strategie di correzione orale dell’errore in classi di italiano L2, Perugia, Guerra.

Monami E., 2021, Correggere l’errore nella classe di italiano L2, Roma, Edilingua.

Mondada L., 2007, “Multimodal Resources for Turn-Taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next Speakers”, in Discourse Studies 9(2), pp. 194–225.

Mori J., Koschmann T., 2012, “Good reasons for seemingly bad performance: Competences at the blackboard and the accountability of a lesson”, in Rasmussen G., Brouwer C.E., Day, D. (a cura di), Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, John Benjamins, pp. 89-118.

Mortensen, K., 2008, “Selecting next speaker in the second language classroom: How to find a willing Next speaker in planned activities”, in Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), pp. 55-79.

Mortensen K., 2016, “The body as a resource for other-initiation of repair: cupping the hand behind the ear”, in Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1), pp. 34-57.

Nigris E., 2009, Le domande che aiutano a capire, Milano, Mondadori.

Orletti F., 2000, La conversazione diseguale. Potere e interazione, Roma, Carocci.

Pitsch K., 2007, “Koordinierung von parallelen Aktivitäten. Zum Anfertigen von Mitschriften im Schulunterricht”, in Schmitt, R. (a cura di), Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion, Tübingen, Narr, pp. 411-446.

Pitsch K., Ayaß R., 2008, „Gespräche in der Schule. Interaktion im Unterricht als multimodaler Prozess“, in Willems, H. (a cura di), Lehr(er)buch Soziologie, Bd. II. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 959-982.

Raineri, K., 2021, Didattica a distanza e insegnamento dell’italiano L2. Dinamiche dell’interazione nella classe digitale, tesi di laurea magistrale, Bressanone, Libera Università di Bolzano.

Sacks H., Schegloff E. A., Jefferson G., 1974, “A simple systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation”, in Language, 50(4), pp. 696-735.

Schegloff E., 2007, Sequence Organization in Interaction. A primer in Conversation Analysis (vol. 1), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff E.A., Jefferson G., Sacks, H., 1977, “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation”, in Language, 53(2), pp. 361-382.

Sidnell J., Stivers, T. (a cura di), 2013, The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Chichester, Wiley & Blackwell.

Sinclair J., Coulthard R., 1975, Towards an Analysis of Discourse: the English Used by Teachers and Pupils, London, Oxford University Press.

Streeck J., Goodwin C., LeBaron C.D. (a cura di) 2011, Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Veronesi, D., 2007, “Movimento nello spazio, prossemica e risorse interazionali: un’analisi preliminare del rapporto tra modalità in contesti didattici accademici”, in VALS/ASLA, 85-III, 107-129.

Veronesi, D., Chizzoni, I., Raineri, K., Schmalz, V., Taferner M., 2020, “Reshaping teacher-student interaction in the virtual classroom: a case study”, in Img journal, 3, pp. 408-427.

Waring H., Creider S., Box C., 2013, “Explaining vocabulary in the second language classroom: A conversation analytical account”, in Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2, pp. 249-264.

Weeks P., 1985, “Error-Correction Techniques and Sequences in Instructional Settings: Toward a Comparative Framework”, in Human Studies, 8(3), pp. 195-233.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15162/1970-1861/1481

Refback

  • Non ci sono refbacks, per ora.